Posted on Leave a comment

Fast Action Can Save Sight if Retina Is Detached or Blocked

The retina is a layer of tissue at the back of the eye that collects light relayed through the lens. Special photoreceptor cells in the retina convert light into nerve impulses, which are transmitted to the brain. At the retina’s center is an especially critical area called the macula, which enables you to see anything directly in front of you, like words on a page, a person’s face, the road ahead or the image on a screen.

When blood flow through the retina is blocked or when the retina pulls away from the wall of the eye, getting the problem properly diagnosed can be an emergency. Modern treatments can do wonders if they are begun before the damage is irreversible. But a delay in getting to a retinal specialist can diminish the ability of even the best therapy to preserve or restore normal vision.

As with all living tissue, the retina is highly dependent on a constant supply of oxygen-carrying blood. Should anything disrupt that, vision is at risk. Two retinal mishaps, retinal-vein occlusion and retinal detachment, can occur at any age, but both are more common among older people.

Recognizing a Blockage

In July, David Bronson of Stone Ridge, N.Y., an avid reader at age 82, realized that the vision in his left eye was a little cloudy. He thought a developing cataract was the cause, but when he saw an ophthalmologist two weeks later, he learned that the problem was more serious: a partial blockage in the central vein that drains blood from the retina.

The blockage caused pressure to build in the capillaries that take blood to the retina, which then leaked into the center of the eye, clouding Mr. Bronson’s vision. The blockage and its consequences are analogous to a clogged sink drain; if water keeps running into the sink, it will eventually spill over the top.

Retinal-vein occlusion is a common cause of vision loss in older people, second only to diabetic retinopathy as a blood vessel disorder of the retina, according to a report last year in The New England Journal of Medicine.

Unlike Mr. Bronson’s experience, retinal-vein occlusion most often involves a branch vein, which is less serious and in half of cases resolves on its own within six months. If treatment is needed, most, though not all, patients respond well to laser therapy, the journal authors reported.

Central retinal-vein occlusion can cause swelling of the macula and loss of central vision. So Mr. Bronson is being treated with monthly injections into his eye of Lucentis, a drug recently licensed for this condition. Injections of steroids into the eye are also often effective.

The article authors, Dr. Tien Y. Wong of the National University of Singapore and Dr. Ingrid U. Scott of Penn State Hershey Eye Center, noted that retinal-vein occlusion occurs in one or two people in 100 older than 40, most often because of a clot and atherosclerosis, a hardening of retinal arteries that puts pressure on a retinal vein.

High blood pressure, Mr. Bronson’s only other health problem, is the leading risk factor for this disorder, but retinal-vein occlusion is also associated with diabetes, elevated blood lipids, smoking, kidney disease and glaucoma.

Typically, patients develop sudden painless vision loss in one eye. The extent of vision loss depends on how much of the retina is affected and whether the macula is involved. Most of the time, the diagnosis can be made based on a clinical exam, although a test called fluorescein angiography is often performed to assess the severity.

Detachment

Retinal detachment, which occurs in about 18 out of 100,000 people a year, is much less common than retinal-vein occlusion but more likely to cause permanent vision loss if not promptly treated. The longer the retina remains detached, the less likely vision can be restored, so it is vital to recognize the symptoms and seek an ophthalmologist’s care without delay.

Retinal detachment is painless but nearly always causes symptoms, often before the detachment starts: a sudden appearance of many “floaters” — spots, hairs or strings — in your vision; sudden brief flashes of light even when your eyes are closed; or a shadow over part of your visual field.

Donald Distasio of Syracuse was 61 when, he said, “I started seeing floaters and blurriness in the inner corner of my right eye.” His optometrist correctly suspected a retinal detachment and immediately sent Mr. Distasio to a retinal surgeon, who explained that the vitreous gel in the center of his eye had pulled on the retina, causing it to tear.

Retinal holes or tears can also result from thinning of the retina with advancing age or from other eye diseases. Once the retina tears, vitreous fluid can leak behind it and push it away from the wall of the eye, preventing images from reaching photoreceptor cells and, ultimately, the brain. The result is a vision blackout of the affected part of the retina.

In addition to age, risk factors for retinal detachment include extreme nearsightedness, a family history of the problem, a prior detachment in one eye, cataract surgery and a severe eye injury, as can occur in an auto accident or from a paint ball, a BB gun or a bungee cord, said Dr. Donald J. D’Amico, chief of ophthalmology at Weill Cornell Medical College and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital.

In an interview, he outlined the usual treatments. The simplest, called pneumatic retinopexy, can be done in the doctor’s office under local anesthesia. A gas bubble is injected into the vitreous cavity. As the gas expands, it presses the retina against the wall of the eye and closes the break. The patient must remain face down for most of several days to weeks to keep the bubble in the right place. The retinal break is often permanently sealed with a freezing probe or laser.

Another common treatment is scleral buckling, done in a hospital under anesthesia but usually on an outpatient basis. A permanent silicone band is sewn to the outside wall of the eyeball, creating an indentation that presses the retina back in place.

A third technique, vitrectomy, is also done in a hospital. The vitreous gel that is pulling on the retina is removed and replaced with gas or liquids that reattach the retina. The procedure is sometimes combined with scleral buckling.

After treatment, it can take many months for vision to improve. The treatment itself may also cause a cataract, requiring further surgery.

 

Posted on 1 Comment

If I Don't Take Your Advice, It's Only Because I'm the Captain!

One of the advantages of being captain is being able to ask for advice without necessarily having to take it.

– Captain Kirk, from Star Trek (Television series)

Posted on Leave a comment

Organic Mesclun Mix with Baked Wild Salmon and Pickled Jalapeños

Takes three minutes to put together. Drizzle some EVOO, a few turns of the black pepper mill, and you have an incredibly delish salad.

P166
P170
P168
P172
P174
P176

Posted on Leave a comment

Baked Sweet Potatoes with Brown Sugar and Black Pepper via Saveur

Media_httpwww2worldpu_sekyp

Thanks, Saveur! This will be on my dinner menu sometime this week!

Ingredients
8 sweet potatoes
1 cup (16 tbsp.) unsalted butter
1 cup (16 tbsp.) dark brown sugar
Fresh-ground black pepper
Kosher salt, to taste

Instructions
Heat oven to 425°. Place sweet potatoes on a foil-lined baking sheet and bake until soft, about 1 hour and 15 minutes. Remove potatoes from oven and allow to cool for 10 minutes. Split potatoes open and put 2 tbsp. butter and 2 tbsp. sugar into each potato. Season liberally with black pepper. Finish with kosher salt to taste.

Sweetpotato

Posted on Leave a comment

What is Obsolete and Outdated Will Soon Disappear

Click Here For Today’s Reading

EZEKIEL 16:42-17:24 | HEBREWS 8:1-13 | PSALM 106:13-31 | PROVERBS 27:7-9

The wrath of the Lord remains unabated, and Ezekiel continues to receive instruction in his vision for what he is to tell the erring people of Israel on what is to befall them.  Using an allegory of two eagles and a vine, Ezekiel is told of what he must tell his people.  He says:  11 Then the word of the LORD came to me: 12 “Say to this rebellious people, ‘Do you not know what these things mean?’ Say to them: ‘The king of Babylon went to Jerusalem and carried off her king and her nobles, bringing them back with him to Babylon. 13 Then he took a member of the royal family and made a treaty with him, putting him under oath. He also carried away the leading men of the land, 14 so that the kingdom would be brought low, unable to rise again, surviving only by keeping his treaty. 15 But the king rebelled against him by sending his envoys to Egypt to get horses and a large army. Will he succeed? Will he who does such things escape? Will he break the treaty and yet escape?  The answer,  of course, is a deafening no!

We turn now to our reading of the book of Hebrews, and see the writer continuing in the same line of thought:  Jesus Christ is the perfect high priest, and replaces every human priest in the Jewish tradition.  This is all for the benefit of the new believers to the Christian faith who have a Jewish heritage and are accustomed to following the Jewish practices of worship.  The writer of this letter, most likely a Jew himself, is now challenging every Jewish tradition– asking that the reader either look at the practice diferently, or get rid of it altogether.

Keep your practices, only view it in a different light, the writer seems to say.  You know of the priest and his functions in the temple; well, here is a more superior priest, nay a high priest, who supercedes every human priest, and offers you direct access to God, the father– put away your old notions, and boldly approach this high priest who will intercede on your behalf, who is himself, God, and who appeared to you as Christ Jesus incarnate.  Are you able to comprehend and accept these truths, the writer seems to say.  To further elaborate on this point, the writer says:  1 Now the main point of what we are saying is this: We do have such a high priest, who sat down at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in heaven, 2 and who serves in the sanctuary, the true tabernacle set up by the Lord, not by a mere human being.

The writer wishes to take his time to explain this slowly and clearly– so there is no room for doubt.  He says:  3 Every high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices, and so it was necessary for this one also to have something to offer. 4 If he were on earth, he would not be a priest, for there are already priests who offer the gifts prescribed by the law. 5 They serve at a sanctuary that is a copy and shadow of what is in heaven. This is why Moses was warned when he was about to build the tabernacle: “See to it that you make everything according to the pattern shown you on the mountain.” 6 But in fact the ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs as the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, since the new covenant is established on better promises.

New covenant, better promises– these are the new concepts that the Jewish person of the first century had to reconcile himself/herself to.  You mean to say that I don’t need to offer up animal sacrifices anymore?  In fact, I don’t even need to go to the temple anymore?  Yes, that’s right, you don’t need to do anything but believe– believe in this new covenant of faith that God has offered to you by way of the plan of sending his own son in the person of Jesus Christ, who was made to be the sacrifice for all mankind, once and for all.

Furthermore, under this new covenant, both Jew and non-Jew are entitled to the free gift of salvation, i.e., a saving of your soul for eternity, by simple faith in the grace of God extended to you, and if you should accept this gift, you need do nothing more– nothing more to earn it, that is.  But you would WANT to do everything you possibly can in order to reflect the same love, grace, mercy, and forgiveness that you have received from God to your fellowmen.  Would it not then give you a personal satisfaction to do unto others what has been freely done unto you?  THAT is the way this new covenant works!

And to wrap us this train of thought, the writer says one last thing:  13 By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear.  Get it?  Got it?  Good!

We turn now to our reading of the psalms, and find ourselves still making our way through Psalm 106.  This, as you may recall, is a chronological account of the history of the children of Israel.  David is recounting the many times that his ancestors had turned away from God, despite the fact that the presence of God was a palpable force around them all the time.  And yet, the people were quick to turn away and take up images and idols to worship.  Such is the checkered history of the people of Israel.  She may be the chosen one, but she never knew it!

Finally, we turn to the book of Proverbs for an interesting mix of proverbs, each speaking to a deeper truth.  Solomon, the wise king, offers these proverbs as food for thought:

7 One who is full loathes honey from the comb,
   but to the hungry even what is bitter tastes sweet.

8 Like a bird that flees its nest
   is anyone who flees from home.

9 Perfume and incense bring joy to the heart,
   and the pleasantness of a friend
   springs from their heartfelt advice.

Posted on Leave a comment

Being Rich, Being Good via Chetan Bhagat in The Times of India

A highly refreshing perspective from from someone on the outside looking in, and making an honest comparison of metrics to determine right from wrong and consequences for the wrong.  A comparison and contrast like this is imperative to allow for a healthy introspection on both sides.  Honor codes in school and at work is serious business, and the laws apply to one and all that violate the rules of conduct.  Time for India to wake up, and smell the coffee.  Original article in the TOI follows:

Recently, Rajat Gupta, ex-CEO of McKinsey and one of the most high-profile corporate figures in America, was arrested on insider trading charges. He is accused of having tipped off Raj Rajaratnam, who once ran a hedge fund worth $7 billion. Rajaratnam, who at his peak had a net worth of $1.8 billion, is already sentenced to 11 years in prison. Thirteen others have been sentenced too. This would seem surprising to many who see America as a nation associated with relentless greed, materialism and consumerism.

When we were growing up, we were often told that `western values` are extremely harmful for society. We Indians were supposed to be more humane, loving, caring, spiritual and genuine. The West was an embodiment of all things wrong – from excess consumption to decline in family values. We were the good ones (or is it G1 these days?).

Yet, it is America that comes down hard on people who break other people`s trust. Punishment for taking more than your fair share – whether through insider trading or corruption – is severe. In Gupta`s case, he may not even have benefited directly – he may have merely tipped off his friend as alleged, unaware how that tip would be used. If proven, that is reason enough for the American system to punish him.

Yes, America is materialistic. It is even greedy to a certain extent. However, Americans have created a system in which wealth is created with hard work, innovation, talent and enterprise. People who display these qualities move up. Every generation in Ame-rica has thrown up several innovators and billion-dollar global corporations, made without government connections. Americans may have a hundred flaws, but they are extremely protective of their system. Anyone who tries to break it to come up in life using unfair means is punished severely. Schools and colleges have a strict honour code against cheating. And no matter how high-profile the person, society doesn`t flinch in teaching the wrongdoer a lesson.

We, on the other hand, don`t even have good laws to prosecute the blatantly corrupt, forget insider trading. Many may not even see insider trading as wrong – we see it as a privilege of being in a position of status or power. Any Dalal Street veteran will tell you, despite regulator SEBI`s commendable efforts, insider trading is rampant among the high and mighty. It is not limited to the stock market. The real estate developer who finds out the zoning master plan of the government beforehand, and pre-emptively buys real estate, is also doing insider trading. However, such people are never punished.

In fact, our government attacks almost every anti-corruption crusader. It is as if the current government has taken a mandate to protect the corrupt. The prime minister, under whom the biggest scams took place, remains in power using every excuse – from `he did not benefit` to `he did not know anything`. In almost any other civilised country, heads would have rolled. Sadly, even our opposition parties have lots of corrupt people. Hence today, even if we want, we can`t vote in an honest government.

What happened? Weren`t we supposed to be the good ones? And yet, it is the greedy, western `baddies` who seem to be doing a better job at being just, truthful and equal. They are not only richer; they seem better too. It is disheartening to face this ugly truth. After all, the poor person is supposed to be the better person – at least that`s what they show in the movies.

Well, we don`t have good leaders because in the past we haven`t cared. We`ve only wanted leaders from our caste or religion. We have been enamoured less by honesty, more by dynasty. We do not have a merit-based system that generates wealth, nor anything in place to protect it. They do. Hence they are richer and, in many cases, better than us. The system we have, in which there are a few kings and lots of common people, cannot generate wealth. It kills innovation and keeps the powerful as rent-seeking controllers of resources. It will eventually turn us into a nation of clerks for the world. Innovators will rule the world; we will be left to serve them. We may not get colonised poli-tically, but will economically.

Can we change this? Of course we can. Society does change, even if slowly. There was a time we used to practise `sati`. We realised it was wrong and now we don`t. To change, first let us accept our shortcomings. We Indians lack some essential, good values. Being part of corrupt society has made us all somewhat corrupt. From copying assignments to faking our children`s ages in railway tickets – we have all done wrong or accepted wrong as part of life. We need to define a set of new values and propagate them in our social circles.

We also need to support positive initiatives, like the Lokpal Bill. Individuals don`t matter in Anna`s team; it is their cause that makes sense and needs support. The media and everyone should startcalling Parliament`s winter session the `Lokpal session`, just so our rulers are reminded of what they are supposed to do. The new Indian quest has begun. It is to be rich, and to be good.