Posted on Leave a comment

I Won’t Have the Stomach for This by Anna Stoessinger

I AM a ravenous, ungraceful eater. I have been compared to a dog and a wolf, and have not infrequently been reminded to chew. I am always the first to finish what’s on my plate, and ever since I was a child at my mother’s table, have perfected the art of stealthily helping myself to seconds before anyone else has even touched fork to frog leg. My husband and I have been known to spend our rent money on the tasting menu at Jean Georges, our savings on caviar or wagyu tartare. We plan our vacations around food — the province of China known for its chicken feet, the village in Turkey that grows the sweetest figs, the town in northwest France with the very best raclette.

So it was a jarring experience when, a few months ago, at 36 years old, I learned I had stomach cancer.

I had only mild symptoms at first: a slight pain below the breastbone when I swallowed, discomfort that felt like nerves or indigestion. Two doctors told me it was nothing. “Take some Prilosec,” they said, which made sense. We had just returned from a trip to Italy. In Florence, we had eaten mounds of roast duck, crostini and rich fish stews; maybe I just had heartburn. But the feeling lingered, and the hypochondriac in me went to the gastroenterologist.

It was a tumor. We got the call early on Friday morning. My husband and I were still in bed, and it took more than a moment to register. At my age, I am not supposed to have stomach cancer. In the United States, it’s a disease that most commonly afflicts older, Asian men, and I am none of these. I have also parted with all my vices, save the occasional sugar binge. But after years of worrying that I might have cancer, years of, “Can you look at this? Is this a lump? What’s this right here? No, here,” I actually did.

I had only one thought about the possibility of death: the fear that I would have to part from my husband a half-century too soon. We had just married in October. We had just moved into a cottage in Connecticut. We had just discovered the simple pleasures of a happy routine. A calendar on the fridge. Roast chicken with leeks for dinner. Losing our life together was what death meant to me, and that, I think, is love.

Thankfully, my doctors assured me that death was a remote possibility. But I wasn’t getting off easily; there were things to lose. First, with three rounds of intense chemotherapy, I lost my appetite. But that was only temporary. Then my surgeon told me that I needed a total gastrectomy — I would have part of my esophagus and all of my stomach permanently removed.

With nothing but a small intestine left to digest food, my gastronomic future would hold only small, frequent meals, consumed slowly and deliberately, without my characteristic gusto. Without abandon. Without — there would be a lot of without.

“You can live without a stomach,” my doctor told me. I have often thought about what I could live without, if I had to: a savings account, an extra bedroom, the new Prada suede platform pump in burgundy. But a stomach never entered my mind. And food? It was so much more. As a little girl, sharing food with my mother was a solace, a joy, and a way of communicating. Sharing it with my husband has been as intimate as anything I’ve experienced. We fell in love one taste at a time: roadside cheeseburgers, bonito with ginger sauce, hazelnut gelato. After the first bite had lingered on our tongues, we’d say to each other: Wait for it. And then: Did you get that? The smoke? The spice? The texture? We always did.

And so, with just 10 days left with my trusted stomach, we set out to capture all that food meant — all the memories it conjured, all the happiness it brought. We were determined to eat as much and as well as possible. We made lists. What categories of food needed attention? Which meals did we want to recreate? We went from lowbrow to high, and everywhere in between. Peanut butter and jelly doughnuts, ginger ice cream, sashimi, grilled porterhouse, wild blueberries. We came up with a plan. Travel options were limited (health, timing), but we would go from Connecticut to Maine to New Brunswick, and finish in New York City three days before my surgery.

On the road, we ate candy in the car like kids. Then, at the White Barn Inn near Kennebunkport, Me., we ate a foie gras and fig torchon, which was velvety, buttery and dusted with pistachios; we ate butter-poached smoked lobster, the summery steam wafting up from the meat; and we tasted scallops with passion fruit coulis, thinly sliced disks of silky pleasure in a sweet, tangy sauce.

MY mother made scallops like nobody else. Perfectly seared and turned in butter. Simple and divine. And she served them at her hugely popular, often impromptu, dinner parties. Watching her cook was what I imagined it was like to watch Jackson Pollock paint. She hurled salt and spices. Spun sugar like a sculptor. Emptied a bottle of rosemary onto a leg of lamb, massaged it with butter into the meat, and turned out a masterpiece. I surged with pride when the first guests arrived and remarked on the wonderful smells sailing out of the kitchen, to whose creation I alone had been witness.

My father was something of a tyrant, and every year my mother and I went to southern France to escape him. We were like war buddies on leave there, and we ate like queens. We drank tea out of giant bowls and picked lavender and stayed at wonderful old inns with names like L’Hermitage. There were cheese courses and pastries and the most delicious filet of sole I’ve ever encountered. There was also a deep and unwavering friendship between my mother and me, the tastes and smells of the food we shared overpowering even our worst memories of my father.

Those summers came back to me at our next stop: the Kingsbrae Arms in St. Andrews, New Brunswick, which had an exquisite dining room, gardens full of lavender and a chef who studied in the south of France. There we sat down to a wild boar terrine and Guinness vegetable soup with rosemary whipped cream. It was sublime and hinted of beef, celery, sweet carrot and earth. Finally, there was a warm apple and cinnamon tarte tartin — not too sweet, not too tart and not quite large enough. I ate mine and half of my husband’s as well, and yearned for more.

It had been a long time since I had experienced such satisfying fullness. There was comfort and exuberance, a familiar feeling like a long embrace, a coming in from the cold — that I fear I will not know again. I know I will mourn my loss. Because for me, food — and eating it with abandon — is about shared experience. It’s about love and memory and the capacity to conquer even the worst hours with something warm and wonderful.

BUT let me be clear: I am unspeakably lucky. Had my diagnosis come even three or four months later, my prognosis would have been much, much darker. I had the surgery two weeks ago, and thankfully everything went smoothly. Once I’ve recovered a bit more, I will be able to eat again. In the future, my meals will be little intermissions throughout the day. Overtures, not full symphonies. They will be small, but I will try to make them grand. Even if it’s just a spoonful of pudding. And I would give up all of my organs for the possibility of many more years with my beloved husband.

We had our last good meal together — our last of the old meals — in Manhattan, at Le Bernardin. It’s the best place in the city for a final meal with a stomach, the best place in the city, arguably, for any meal. When I called the hostess for a last-minute table, I was told that the only seating they had was at 10:45. I pulled out the big guns: “I have stomach cancer, and this is literally my last meal with a stomach.”

“Well,” she said, irritated, “I suppose we can seat you at 5:30.”

What a town. And what a magnificent meal it was.

Stomach-popup

 

Posted on Leave a comment

Happy Birthday, Madonna: (Quicker Than A) Ray Of Light

Ray-of-light_madonna_wait-music

 

Posted on Leave a comment

For The Stubbornly Nostalgic and the Sad Hedonists, An Observation

To be interested in the changing seasons is a happier state of mind than to be hopelessly in love with spring.

– George Santayana (1863-1952) Spanish-born American philosopher, writer

Posted on Leave a comment

Gnarls Barkley / Thievery Corporation | Austin City Limits | PBS Video

It ain’t over until the bald man sings! Oh, and that other stuff from Thievery Corp. is from their Radio Retaliation album.

Thievery_corporation_radio_retaliation

Posted on Leave a comment

Bheja Fry 2, 2011

Somehow, I remember laughing a lot more at the first Bheja Fry– not that I remember that story too well actually, but still, if that is the only first impression I have of this movie in comparison to the first, it is, I think, a significant one.  

Significant, because it openly implies it wasn’t all that great.  Well, it did have some funny moments, but they unfortunately were few and far in between, and the air of predictability was so overwhelming throughout, it made the entire movie underwhelming. 

Actually, a very rough but not that inaccurate a parallel that may be drawn to the storyline of this movie is that it appeared to be a haphazard combination of two popular American television shows from the sixties and seventies– the reruns for which I watched with gay abandon in the late eighties and early nineties:  Love Boat and Gilligan’s Island.

‘Nuff said!

Bhejafry2

Posted on Leave a comment

Small Yet Significant Ironies Of Life

We know what we are, but know not what we may be.

– Wm. Shakespeare in Hamlet, Act IV: 5

Posted on Leave a comment

The Lungi (and its Madras Checks) Gets a Fashion Makeover

The lungi (and its Madras checks) gets a fashion makeover

With Oprah’s website recently recommending an IOU scarf as a ‘gift to give’, our Tartan-of-the-East might just have a new, haute career.

By Chryselle D’Silva Dias

“Lungis are what a gali ka goonda wears,” chides a user on an online forum to a friend who is extolling its virtues. Although it is a staple of men (and often, women) in Southern India, the lungi has a somewhat unsavoury reputation elsewhere. Considered too humble to be chic, there are few trendy takers for this cheerful checked garment.

There are exceptions, of course.

They have shown up on the catwalk in India. Wendell Rodricks and Satya Paul have both showcased bright, flowing lungis. Rodricks has a special affinity for the garment and uses them in all his collections. “I wear a lungi daily,” he says.

Fashion blogger Mitali Parekh loves her lungis and often uses them as a wrap over shorts. “The lungi was very fashionable in the 70s and my mother and father both wore it with ‘guru shirts’,” says Parekh. She gets her stash from little shops in Dadar and Kala Chowki that still sell vintage block prints.

Often made from silk, sheer cotton or linen in saturated hues, designer lungis make for ideal resort wear, a replacement for the sarong. But the traditional checked lungi has probably never made it to Page 3.

All that might just change if the recently launched IOUProject goes viral.

Madrid-based fashion designer and entrepreneur Kavita Parmar and her ‘The IOU Project‘, are buying reams of classic Madras Checks from weavers in Tamil Nadu through Co-optex, and converting them into high-end, beautifully tailored clothing. Using master tailors in Europe, the simple handloom cloth transforms into elegant jackets, shirts, skirts and classic dresses. These are then sold exclusively online using social media.

The IOU strategy is unique, as are each of its garments. Every outfit has a story, a name attached to it, and is “traceable”. A special QR (Quick Response) Code sewn into each garment allows you to identify the weaver who created the cloth and the tailor who put it together. Buyers can upload their own photos as well, to complete the chain. A look at the IOU website allows you to see ‘real’ users wearing the garments.  That gives the weaver a sense of pride in his work as he sees people all over the world wearing his hand-woven cloth.  That’s a key link that is missing in traditional industries overtaken by middlemen.

 

Madrid-based The IOU Project is buying reams of classic Madras Checks from weavers in Tamil Nadu and converting them into high-end clothing. rinproject/Flickr

Parmar has two other fashion brands to her credit – Maison Raasta and Suzie Wong. She has used the Madras Check/Lungi patterns in her designs for Raasta collections before. “Everyone owns a Madras Check in some shape or form,” she says. “But most of the so-called Madras in nearly all shops around the world doesn’t come from Madras; in fact most of it is not even made in India.”

Realising that the weavers in India don’t get any real benefit from the widely used traditional patterns, Parmar signed up Co-optex to supply 30,000 lungis by the end of September. Around 246 weavers working in nine co-operative societies in Kurijipadi are involved in the project and have all agreed to work to “a higher standard” for higher pay.

Each loom can create an eight-meter fabric at a time. One lungi is just two meters of this length. IOU takes the entire eight-meter and comes up with a shirt, a skirt, a pair of trousers or a dress from that cloth. Because each length is unique (traditionally, the weaver decides the pattern and colours of each length for himself), no two garments are the same.

While it might be too soon to expect a rush of people wearing the lungi, the checks are certainly going places.  And hopefully they will make a difference where it really counts. The above-average pay rates (and other benefits, including a fund for the village) may encourage the young people of the villages to rethink their factory jobs and return to the loom instead.

In Goa, Wendell Rodricks’ revival of the Kunbi sari has been a decade-long labour of love and hard work. Rodricks took this almost-extinct garment of the marginalised Kunbi tribe and transformed it into soft drapes of muted cotton. The Kunbi weave shows up in Rodricks’ kurtas, trousers, elegant tops and of course, saris that are stunning in their simplicity. Rodricks wants to empower Kunbi women to return to weaving their distinctive saris and be proud of their roots. This, he hopes, will be his lasting legacy.

For Kavita Parmar, the journey down this road is just beginning. The positive response to the clothes has been encouraging. And with Oprah’s website recently recommending an IOU scarf as a ‘gift to give’, our Tartan-of-the-East might just have a new, haute career.

 

Posted on Leave a comment

A Facebook Birthday: Insidious Alerts And All

Virginia Heffernan

Virginia Heffernan on digital and pop culture.

Happy birthday!! With two exclamation points, as we do it on Facebook. It’s your birthday today, right? I send you many happy returns — and a wish that you are, if only for today, among the 750 million active Facebook users.

Yes, Facebook can be capricious and tyrannical and tedious, but the leviathan social network is the best thing that’s ever happened to birthdays.

A seemingly small but cleverly gracious component of the digital universe.

Come to think of it, how did we manage birthdays, those nettlesome sources of narcissism and guilt, before the Internet? I’m trying to remember. It seems there was always a scale problem. Birthdays in analog times were over-celebrated (as for children or the powerful), or they were neglected (as for everyone else). It stung when people forgot your birthday, sure, but the shame of caring or, worse yet, reminding people to care about your birthday stung much more deeply.

I’m now convinced that if you’d asked me what I wanted for any birthday, or indeed for anyone else’s birthday, before 2007, when I joined Facebook, I would have said I wanted a mechanism that made it easy for people to wish one another happy birthday. In my fantasy app, celebrators of birthdays wouldn’t have to be seen craving attention, but they’d still have their presence on this third rock from the sun gratefully and annually acknowledged. At the same time, acquaintances and intimates wouldn’t have to go to heroic mnemonic lengths, or hire secretaries, to keep calendars marked and birthday greetings in the mail.

Facebook’s birthday feature is a seemingly small but cleverly gracious component of the digital universe. When you join the massive site, you enter in the date you were born, leaving off the year if you choose. You don’t do this because you are a birthday-fanatic who expects weeks of flowers. You do it because — well, you’re also entering in where you went to college and whether you like “Rescue Me,” so why not your birthday?

And then the day arrives. Alerted to its imminence, and then to its arrival, Facebook friends have been conspicuously urged on their own pages this way: “Joe Jones. It’s his birthday. Say happy birthday.” To honor this command, they need only click “Say happy birthday” and type a few characters. It takes effort and misanthropy to refuse.

“Happy birthday!!” a friend can type with the exact degree of effort — no less and no more — that one human honestly feels like mustering once a year on behalf of the existence of another human to whom she is not related or similarly psychically indebted.

The keystrokes of a birthday greeting cost the person who enters them next to nothing, a penny in exertion and symbolic labor. But the Facebook greeting still carries something like eye contact, recognition and a smile — humanness. Which is, paradoxically, what people most fervently traffic in the shimmering cyberworld of the Internet.

At this moment, when so many of the world’s markets seem haywire — with the logic of supply, demand, pricing and debt broken — seeing an economy that works as well as Facebook’s birthday feature gives a flash of hope.

But not everyone sees Facebook’s birthday-nomics as the creation of efficiencies in a marketplace of kindness and humanity. In Slate, not long ago, David Plotz decided that Facebook birthday greetings were fakery itself, and an attempt by people who offer them “to build social capital — undeserved social capital.” What was so obnoxious and opportunistic about the greetings? Plotz had an answer: “It’s all too obvious that the greetings are programmed, canned, and impersonal, prompted by a Facebook alert.”

Hmm. Fascinating — and enlightening about how different reality and humanness are defined in virtual space. To Plotz, a birthday greeting is only meaningful — only real — if the person offering it uses analog memory aids. (Presumably, a birthday greeting inspired by a calendar, a good brain for dates or a nagging spouse would not be fraudulent.) “It’s one thing to remember your friend’s birthday because you took him out a decade ago for his drunken 21st birthday debauch,” Plotz writes, applauding a path to memory that requires 10 years and possibly the psychic penetration of a boozy blackout. “It’s much lamer to ‘remember’ your friend’s birthday because Facebook told you to.”

For a birthday greeting to really sing with authenticity, then, the memory-retrieval behind it should have required some genuine dredging — battle with the limits of neurobiology. Plotz, for his birthday, wants to see a little sacrifice from his friends. By contrast, what makes the Facebook birthday alerts insidious to him is what makes them benign to me: that the alerts work, don’t disproportionately favor calendrical geniuses or drunks having flashbacks, and never fail. Also, I like that they engender actual greetings.

That’s right: So far, bots and spammers don’t seem to be among the well-wishers on a Facebook birthday. Real humans send the greetings. And they’re customized. The majority of Facebook birthday greeters use exclamation points; many add earnest hopes for well-being and prosperity; some come up with real witticisms. To me, on my birthday, these well-wishes invariably seem like a surfeit of good will beamed at me from the universe itself.

Facebook’s greeting says to a human, “I was told your name, and told it was your birthday, and I didn’t do nothing.”

Sometimes, like on your birthday, that’s a perfect gift.