Posted on Leave a comment

Zeera Papads: Time To Get The Evening Started

Posted on Leave a comment

Aarakshan, 2011

What does affirmative action truly mean?  Is it necessary?  Is it effective?  Who does it really benefit?  Why is it such a controversial topic?  These and related questions are the stuff that Aarakshan attempts to cover in this almost three-hour long movie.  An oft-debated but unfortunately dimly-understood topic, the notion of affirmative action is a highly charged one, at least in India.  While the Mandal Commission’s recommendations for affirmative action policies in education and employment were well-meaning, the unintended consequences of the application of the law left much to be desired.  Notwithstanding this fact, it is a travesty of societal shortsightedness that prevents one community, nay, one person, from appreciating another’s point of view.  Especially in a land where the population is so large and ever-growing, that there isn’t too much room– or time– for reflection and appreciation of multiple perspectives.

But coming back to the movie, I believe that the story does a fine job– yes, I said, fine job– of covering this complex topic.  And unlike the many Indian reviews that I’ve read about this movie, I am glad to report that I didn’t believe the storyline was disjointed– it might have been somewhat belabored on a few points of personal introspection and episodes of self-pity, but in the final analysis, this is a story that went beyond the immediate impact of the alleged justice and injustice of a well-meaning program; it spoke to the heart of the matter in recommending practical courses of action that would go to the root of the problem.  One cannot expect an affirmative-action program to be an end-all; it is only a token measure to redress the wrongs of the past, and to acknowledge that inequities in wealth and social standing are very real determinants of the success that one makes of one’s life.  True “equal opportunity” would be one that gave two parties the equal opportunity to gain something– when all other factors leading up to the moment of reaching for that opportunity have been equal.  But when that has not been true, i.e., when there have been glaring differences in the quality of life in both parties leading up to that moment of reaching for that proverbial apple of opportunity, it is then not really “equal”!  This is a fundamental fact that one and all must understand, sooner or later.  The so-called playing-field was never equal to begin with, so how can you assume the “opportunity” would be equal?  It is not.  Which is why the establishment of affirmative-action programs are essential to a society that wishes to count itself among the enlightened and the just.  This is the heart of the matter of this topic, and one that this movie has quite remarkably tried to build upon.

Sure, there were some detours and deviations along the way in this movie, but then if it weren’t for that, it might as well have become a documentary!  But once the story got to the core of the argument– which was to highlight the unequal playing-field in a land already torn with so much inequality, it then went on to weave into the story the ways and means by which one ought to address the problem.  The answer lies not in further building up an infrastructure of coaching and tutorial establishments outside of our institutions of secondary and higher education, but rather in taking a good look into the mirror and putting down seeds into the hearts and minds of the parents and students at large, and in building a garden to grow and nurture from within the establishment.

Mr. Bachchan, this is another lovely feather in your cap, and Mr. Saif Ali Khan, you’re starting to show serious promise for roles beyond the usual song-and-dance man.  As for Mr. Prakash Jha– as director, you have my admiration for taking on a notoriously difficulty subject and building greater and deeper awareness that goes beyond the superficial.  Incidentally, that personal angle on Mr. Bachchan’s character wasn’t all that tedious when you think about it– it was an insightful study into a defense mechanism that has to be applauded as being one of the better human responses to a frustrating set of circumstances, and one that may even be emulated for all the strength of character it portrays.  Because we all know of course, that what won’t kill us will only make us stronger! 

Aarakshan

Posted on 1 Comment

If You Touch a Baby Bird, Will Its Mother Really Abandon It?

Mike Truchon / Shutterstock.com

When I was a kid, our living room opened out onto a back deck through a set of French doors. A pine tree stood over the deck, providing a home for countless birds. Baby birds would regularly fall from their nests onto the deck, and would lie there crying in full view of my brother and me as we sat on the floor watching TV. Our parents always told us that we should never attempt to rescue these birds, no matter how long they were out on the deck, because our scent would cause their parents to reject and abandon them.

Some of these babies would get their act together and find their way back into the nest. Some would get dragged off by neighborhood cats. A few got plucked off the deck by hawks (and, once, devoured as I watched). Whatever happened to the birds, though, my brother and I dutifully listened to our mother.

These days, I feel bad about that. It turns out my mom is full of baloney.

Scent of a Human

Birds will not readily abandon their young because they “smell humans.” For one thing, birds don’t have a great sense of smell. Their olfactory bulbs are small and simple compared to other animals (although this wasn’t always the case, and there are exceptions to the rule, like the turkey vulture, albatross and kiwi), and they’re not going to be able to pick out your scent from all the other smells hitting their beaks at any given moment.

Even if they could detect your scent, and make a negative association with it, they’re not just going to up and leave. You wouldn’t abandon your kids and home at the first sign of danger, would you? Even if you didn’t love either all that much, you already went through the trouble of painting the living room and changing all those dirty diapers, right? Birds will make that same simple economic decision. They’ve invested a lot of time and energy in those babies and they’re not going to give them up for nothing. Mess around with a nest before the eggs are laid or before they hatch, and a bird might re-nest elsewhere, but once the kids are in the picture, they’re no push-overs.

Rescue Mission

So, my mother is obviously no ornithologist, and she’s not your mom, so feel free to ignore her advice. (Sort of. Let me explain.)

There are two types of baby birds you’re likely to encounter on the ground: nestlings and fledglings. Nestlings are featherless or fuzzy and are too young to leave the nest. Fledglings have their feathers and are old enough to leave the nest and be on the ground, making their first bold steps away from home under the watchful eye of mom and dad.

Fledglings you should leave alone. They’ll usually sit around for a few days outside the nest before their flight skills develop enough that they don’t need their parents. If you’ve got a fledgling near your home and are worried about predators, ask your neighbors to keep their cats inside. Hawks? Well, that’s just the circle of life.

Nestlings, though, could probably use a helping hand. Pick them up and put them pack in the nest, and their parents will not think any less of them if they smell a little bit like a human. What you should not do is take the little guys inside and try to care for them yourself. Sure, you’re at the top of the food chain. You’re smart and civilized and have dominion over the natural world. But you are not a bird. You will make a lousy bird mom.

Baby-birds

 

Posted on Leave a comment

193/365/01

193

Posted on Leave a comment

Coke & Dog: Can You Beat That For $1.70?

P497